Auditory brainstem implants for hearing rehabilitation in NF2-schwannomatosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: NF2-schwannomatosis (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disorder prone to hearing loss. Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) offer a promising solution for hearing rehabilitation in NF2. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize existing literature on ABI implantation in NF2, focusing on audiological outcomes and ABI-related complications. METHODS: The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022362155). Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CMB, and CNKI from inception to August 2023. Data on environmental sound discrimination, open-set discrimination, closed-set discrimination, and ABI-related complications were extracted and subjected to meta-analysis. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies were included. The pooled estimate was 58% (95% CI 49-66%) for environmental sound discrimination and 55% (95% CI 40-69%) for closed-set discrimination. Regarding open-set discrimination, the pooled estimates were 30% (95% CI 19-42%) for sound only, 46% (95% CI 37-54%) for lip-reading only, and 63% (95% CI 55-70%) for sound plus lip-reading. The pooled occurrence of ABI-related complications was 33% (95% CI 15-52%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis underscores the effectiveness and safety of ABIs in NF2, providing valuable insights for evidence-based decision-making and hearing rehabilitation strategies.

Comparing Speech Recognition Outcomes Between Cochlear Implants and Auditory Brainstem Implants in Patients With NF2-Related Schwannomatosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cochlear implant (CI) and auditory brainstem implant (ABI) performance in patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis (NF2). STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: A total of 58 devices among 48 patients were studied, including 27 ABIs implanted from 1997 to 2022 and 31 CIs implanted from 2003 to 2022. Three patients had bilateral ABIs, three had bilateral CIs, three had an ABI on one side and a CI on the other, one had a CI that was later replaced with an ipsilateral ABI, and one had an ABI and CI concurrently on the same side. INTERVENTIONS: CI or ABI ipsilateral to vestibular schwannoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Open-set speech perception, consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores, and AzBio sentence in quiet scores. RESULTS: Among all patients, 27 (47%) achieved open-set speech perception, with 35 (61%) daily users at a median of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12-87 mo) after implantation. Comparing outcomes, CIs significantly outperformed ABIs; 24 (77%) CIs achieved open-set speech perception compared with 3 (12%) ABIs, with median consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio scores of 31% (IQR, 0-52%) and 57% (IQR, 5-83%), respectively, for CIs, compared with 0% (IQR, 0-0%) and 0% (IQR, 0-0%), respectively, for ABIs. Patients with ABIs were younger at diagnosis and at implantation, had larger tumors, and were more likely to have postoperative facial paresis. CONCLUSION: Many patients with NF2-associated vestibular schwannoma achieved auditory benefit with either a CI or an ABI; however, outcomes were significantly better in those patients who were able to receive a CI. When disease and anatomy permit, hearing rehabilitation with a CI should be considered over an ABI in these patients. Tumor management strategies that increase the ability to successfully use CIs should be strongly considered given the high risk of losing bilateral functional acoustic hearing in this population.

[AUDITORY BRAINSTEM IMPLANTS (ABI) IN CHILDREN: CASE SERIES IN SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER].

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants (CI) are the treatment of choice for individuals with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. A small group of patients, with pathology central to the cochlea, cannot benefit from CI. Examples in children include absence of the cochlear-nerve or cochlear aplasia. In these cases, implantation of an auditory brainstem implant (ABI), directly stimulating the cochlear nucleus, bypassing the inner-ear and auditory-nerve, may be beneficial. OBJECTIVES: Describe a series of children with ABI's treated in Shaare-Zedek, including the first ABI implantation in Israel (2017). METHODS: Of 9 patients with ABI's treated in Shaare Zedek Medical Center ,7 were children implanted between ages 2-8.6 years. Five boys and two girls. Surgeries were conducted in collaboration between neurosurgeons, neurotologists and audiologists (five implanted in Shaare-Zedek and two in New-York University). Follow-up was between 2-6 years. Hearing evaluation was conducted, mainly, with audiograms, categories of auditory performance (CAP), speech perception testing when possible and estimation of device use per day. RESULTS: Six of the seven children, who initially underwent unsuccessful CI, had deficient auditory-nerves. One child had cochlear-aplasia. In 3 children hearing loss was part of the CHARGE syndrome. CAP scores ranged from 0-7 (0,1,3,5,5,7). One child was able to achieve open-set speech perception. CONCLUSIONS: Although functional auditory outcomes for children with ABI are inferior to CI recipients and are highly variable, some children were able to obtain significant benefit. In these children, who are not candidates for CI, the ABI presents the only chance for auditory awareness and may be recommended. DISCUSSION: John Thomas Roland is a consultant and recipient of research support from Cochlear Americas.

Hearing Rehabilitation in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 2: The Quebec's Experience With Auditory Implants.

OBJECTIVE: To review a single-center experience with hearing rehabilitation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and to describe the auditory outcomes of cochlear implants (CIs) and auditory brainstem implants (ABI) in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twelve adult patients with NF2 who received a CI (n = 10) and/or an ABI (n = 5) between 2000 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Insertion of a CI and/or an ABI in NF2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VSs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' demographic data, treatment history, hearing evolution, hearing rehabilitation methods, implant details, and auditory outcomes after implantation. RESULTS: Among those who received a CI, five patients had a stable untreated VS, one patient underwent a cochlear nerve preserving surgery, and four patients received radiotherapy treatments. Six patients became regular users of their device. The median open-set sentence recognition scores were as follows: 0.5% preoperatively, 60% at 1 year postoperatively, and 80% on the most recent audiological evaluation. All patients with an ABI were implanted concomitantly with VS surgical excision, and three of them also received radiotherapy treatments. The median open-set sentence recognition scores were as follows: 4% preoperatively, 26% at 1 year postoperatively, and 0% on the most recent evaluation. Three patients became regular ABI users. CONCLUSION: Despite major technological advances, auditory outcomes with ABIs remain deceiving. Considering the overall improvement in postoperative auditory performances provided by CIs compared with ABIs, cochlear implantation standouts as a primary mean of hearing rehabilitation in NF2 patients.

Evaluation of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) users' auditory behavior in everyday life.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the everyday listening status of pediatric ABI users using the Turkish ABEL questionnaire. METHODS: The study included 33 parents of children with auditory brainstem implant, and 28 parents of children with cochlear implant were included as a control group. All implant users were between the ages of 4-14. Parents answered the ABEL questionnaire to assess their child's auditory behavior in their daily living environment. In addition, Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales were used to evaluate speech perception and production. RESULTS: Auditory-aural, auditory awareness and ABEL total score of ABI users were statistically significantly lower than the CI group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the Conversational/Social skills subgroups. It was found that as the duration of ABI use increased, auditory-verbal, social skills and total scores increased significantly. In addition, correlations were obtained between ABEL total and subscale scores and CAP and SIR scores. CONCLUSIONS: Parents believe that their children adapt nicely to ABI and are aware of environmental sounds. This study reveals the auditory, aural, and social skills of children using ABI through the regards of their parents. This study showed that the ABEL questionnaire, which was used in previous studies to express parental views of children with hearing aids and cochlear implants, can also be used for parents of children using ABI.

Sensitivity to Pulse Rate and Amplitude Modulation in an Animal Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Our previous study (McInturff et al., 2022) showed that single-pulse stimulation of the dorsal (D)CN subdivision with low levels of current evokes responses that have early latencies, different than the late response patterns observed from stimulation of the ventral (V)CN. How these differing responses encode more complex stimuli, such as pulse trains and amplitude modulated (AM) pulses, has not been explored. Here, we compare responses to pulse train stimulation of the DCN and VCN, and show that VCN responses, measured in the inferior colliculus (IC), have less adaption, higher synchrony, and higher cross-correlation. However, with high-level DCN stimulation, responses become like those to VCN stimulation, supporting our earlier hypothesis that current spreads from electrodes on the DCN to excite neurons located in the VCN. To AM pulses, stimulation of the VCN elicits responses with larger vector strengths and gain values especially in the high-CF portion of the IC. Additional analysis using neural measures of modulation thresholds indicate that these measures are lowest for VCN. Human ABI users with low modulation thresholds, who score best on comprehension tests, may thus have electrode arrays that stimulate the VCN. Overall, the results show that the VCN has superior response characteristics and suggest that it should be the preferred target for ABI electrode arrays in humans.

The experience of auditory implant recipients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: Factors associated with pain.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with cochlear implants (CI) and auditory brainstem implants (ABI) require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following implantation. This study explores the patient experience of MRI, identifying factors associated with pain, and the effect of interventions designed to enhance comfort and safety. METHODS: A prospective observational case series from a tertiary referral unit. Tight head bandaging ± local anaesthetic injection (devices with non-MRI-compatible magnets) or observation alone (implants with MRI-compatible magnets) were employed for 1.5 T MRI of consecutive adult patients with CI or ABI without magnet removal. Pain was recorded via visual analogue scale (1 = no pain, 5 = extreme pain) at three time points; (1) baseline, (2) head bandage applied (3) during scanning. Patient age, device type, body area imaged and total scan time were recorded as variables, alongside adverse events. RESULTS: Data were collected for 227 MRI scans (34 patients with ABI, 32 with CI). In patients managed with bandaging, pain score after bandaging but prior to scanning (median 2.2) did not differ from pain during scanning (2.1), but both were significantly higher than baseline (1.4, both P ≤ 0.001). Scanning areas other than the head/cervical spine was associated with higher pain scores (P = 0.036). Pain during MRI differed between different manufacturers implants (P ≤ 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 8/227 scans (3.5%), none occurring with devices containing an MRI-compatible magnet. CONCLUSION: MRI scanning with auditory implant magnets in situ is safe and well tolerated by patients.

Ten-year follow-up of auditory brainstem implants: From intra-operative electrical auditory brainstem responses to perceptual results.

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) can provide hearing sensation to individuals where the auditory nerve is damaged. However, patient outcomes with the ABI are typically much poorer than those for cochlear implant recipients. A major limitation to ABI outcomes is the number of implanted electrodes that can produce auditory responses to electric stimulation. One of the greatest challenges in ABI surgery is the intraoperative positioning of the electrode paddle, which must fit snugly within the cochlear nucleus complex. While there presently is no optimal procedure for intraoperative electrode positioning, intraoperative assessments may provide useful information regarding viable electrodes that may be included in patients' clinical speech processors. Currently, there is limited knowledge regarding the relationship between intraoperative data and post-operative outcomes. Furthermore, the relationship between initial ABI stimulation with and long-term perceptual outcomes is unknown. In this retrospective study, we reviewed intraoperative electrophysiological data from 24 ABI patients (16 adults and 8 children) obtained with two stimulation approaches that differed in terms of neural recruitment. The interoperative electrophysiological recordings were used to estimate the number of viable electrodes and were compared to the number of activated electrodes at initial clinical fitting. Regardless of the stimulation approach, the intraoperative estimate of viable electrodes greatly overestimated the number of active electrodes in the clinical map. The number of active electrodes was associated with long-term perceptual outcomes. Among patients with 10-year follow-up, at least 11/21 active electrodes were needed to support good word detection and closed-set recognition and 14/21 electrodes to support good open-set word and sentence recognition. Perceptual outcomes were better for children than for adults, despite a lower number of active electrodes.

Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant.

OBJECTIVES: After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. METHODS: The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.

Hearing and language development in children with brainstem implants: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To present scientific evidence, based on a systematic review of the literature, on the benefit of brainstem implants in auditory rehabilitation and language development in children. METHODS: A systematic search was used to identify studies that contain information about the benefit of brainstem implants in the auditory rehabilitation and language development of children. The review was conducted based on a structured literature search, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The search was carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, using the combination "Auditory brainstem implants" AND "Pediatric", without restriction of language, period, and location. The quality assessment of the articles was performed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools. RESULTS: Regarding hearing, children with brainstem implants showed sound detection, access to most speech sounds, basic auditory perception skills, recognition of ambient sounds, recognition of some frequently used words and phrases, in addition to some closed-set word discrimination capability. Expressive and comprehensive language were identified in children using auditory brainstem implants, increasing significantly in the short and long terms in most cases; however, in some of the children, such skills remained stable. CONCLUSION: The auditory brainstem implant can be considered an effective alternative for children with cochlear malformation and/or auditory nerve deficiency and for those who cannot benefit from cochlear implant surgery.

Intraword Variability in Children With Auditory Brainstem Implants: A Longitudinal Comparison With Children With Cochlear Implants.

PURPOSE: Intraword variability designates the phenomenon that a particular target word is produced variably by a child at one point in the child's development. In this study, the amount of intraword variability is studied longitudinally in children with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). Auditory brainstem implantation is a relative recent technique in pediatric hearing restoration. Therefore, little is known about the phonological development of these children's speech. METHOD: The intraword variability is investigated in three children with ABI, in comparison to children with cochlear implants, matched on lexical development. Intraword variability is measured using relative entropy in order to take into account the frequency distribution in children's productions. RESULT: Results showed considerable variation between the three children with ABI. Still, all children had higher levels of intraword variability in their spontaneous speech productions as compared to children with cochlear implants. CONCLUSION: It seems that children with ABI are lagging behind their phonological development in reference to children with cochlear implants.

Speech intelligibility of children with an auditory brainstem implant: a triple-case study.

Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is a relative recent development in paediatric hearing restoration. Consequently, young-implanted children's productive language has not received much attention. This study investigated speech intelligibility of children with ABI (N = 3) in comparison to children with cochlear implants (CI) and children with typical hearing (TH). Spontaneous speech samples were recorded from children representing the three groups matched on cumulative vocabulary level. Untrained listeners (N = 101) rated the intelligibility of one-word utterances on a continuous scale and transcribed each utterance. The rating task yielded a numerical score between 0 and 100, and similarities and differences between the listeners' transcriptions were captured by a relative entropy score. The speech intelligibility of children with CI and children with TH was similar. Speech intelligibility of children with ABI was well below that of the children with CI and TH. But whereas one child with ABI's intelligibility approached that of the control groups with increasing lexicon size, the intelligibility of the two other children with ABI did not develop in a similar direction. Overall, speech intelligibility was only moderate in the three groups of children, with quite low ratings and considerable differences in the listeners' transcriptions, resulting in high relative entropy scores.

Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).

The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is an auditory neuroprosthesis that provides hearing to deaf patients by electrically stimulating the cochlear nucleus (CN) of the brainstem. Whether such stimulation activates one or the other of the CN's two major subdivisions is not known. Here, we demonstrate clear response differences from the stimulation of the dorsal (D) vs. ventral (V) subdivisions of the CN in a mouse model of the ABI with a surface-stimulating electrode array. For the DCN, low levels of stimulation evoked multiunit responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) that were unimodally distributed with early latencies (avg. peak latency of 3.3 ms). However, high levels of stimulation evoked a bimodal distribution with the addition of a late latency response peak (avg. peak latency of 7.1 ms). For the VCN, in contrast, electrical stimulation elicited multiunit responses that were usually unimodal and had a latency similar to the DCN's late response. Local field potentials (LFP) from the IC showed components that correlated with early and late multiunit responses. Surgical cuts to sever the output of the DCN, the dorsal acoustic stria (DAS), gave insight into the origin of these early and late responses. Cuts eliminated early responses but had little-to-no effect on late responses. The early responses thus originate from cells that project through the DAS, such as DCN's pyramidal and giant cells. Late responses likely arise from the spread of stimulation from a DCN-placed electrode array to the VCN and could originate in bushy and/or stellate cells. In human ABI users, the spread of stimulation in the CN may result in abnormal response patterns that could hinder performance.

Written language skills in children with auditory brainstem implants.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the written language skills of children with auditory brainstem implants (ABI). METHODS: In this study, 15 children (from second to eighth grades) with ABI were evaluated for their written language abilities using a written expression skill assessment form. Five different features of written expression points were scored and analyzed, yielding a composite score for written expression skills. RESULTS: This study showed that all children with ABI needed more verbal cues than spontaneously written samples. Moreover, these children used short and simple sentences with limited vocabulary and repeated words and sentences. Furthermore, these children were deficient in writing an introduction, the body, and the conclusion paragraphs and could not write events in a logical sequence. CONCLUSIONS: The written language skills of children with ABI depend on age at implantation, duration of implant use, and additional handicaps. Written expression skills in children with ABI are highly complex skills. The findings highlight the importance of ABI during the critical language development period and the enhancement of training programs for written language skills in children who underwent ABI.

Auditory Brainstem Implants-Hearing Restoration in Congenitally Deaf Children.

BACKGROUND: Children who are born deaf can learn to hear and to speak with the aid of a cochlear implant (CI). If the implantation of a CI is not possible for anatomical reasons, an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) is the only surgical option for auditory rehabilitation. It is estimated that about 5 to 45 children could potentially benefit from this treatment in Germany each year. In this article, we present and discuss the current state of the scientific evidence. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications from 2010 onward. 15 articles reporting at least 10 cases with at least one year of auditory follow-up were included in the analysis. The results, including CAP ("categories of auditory performance") scores on a scale of 0 to 7, are presented and compared with the authors' own findings in a series of 38 patients. RESULTS: All of the publications show that children who do not suffer from impairments of other kinds hear significantly better with an ABI than those with additional handicaps. Early implantation is advantageous, under the age of three years if possible. The results vary widely across publications and from patient to patient. The mean CAP score in all publications is 3.57 (standard deviation [SD], 1.04). 38.24% of the patients (SD 18.68) achieved the ability to understand spoken language (CAP ≥= 5), more specifically, the ability to communicate in everyday life without lip reading, in person and some even succeed in conversing over the telephone. CONCLUSION: ABI is a safe and effective treatment for sensorineural deafness in congenitally deaf children who cannot be treated with a cochlear implant. In particular, children without any other impairments have a good chance of developing the ability to understand spoken language, especially if the implantation is performed early.

Revision Surgery for Pediatric Nontumor Auditory Brainstem Implant Users: Audiological, Rehabilitative, and Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report the audiological, rehabilitative, and surgical outcomes of revision surgery for pediatric auditory brainstem implant (ABI) users. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Five pediatric ABI users who had revision surgery for device malfunctions. INTERVENTIONS: Revision surgery for ABI malfunctions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The findings of free-field audiometry with the device, the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, and the pattern discrimination, word identification, sentence recognition, and expressive and receptive language tests before the device failure and after revision surgery were obtained from the patient records and compared. RESULTS: The revision rate for pediatric ABI was 6.45%. The Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and expressive-receptive language scores showed improvements following revision surgery, while the aided thresholds, pattern perception, and word identification scores did not change. Individual differences in performance for these measures were observed. CONCLUSION: Equal or improved performance after the revision surgeries in the current study showed that revision surgery is successful and important for pediatric ABI users. It is essential to consider remedying the loss of auditory input in sensitive periods of pediatric development.

Safety of 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Auditory Brainstem Implants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with auditory brainstem implants (ABI) with the magnet removed at implantation and report incidence of complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary neurotology ambulatory practice. PATIENTS: Patients with diagnosis of Neurofibromatosis, type 2 (NF2) with functional ABIs. INTERVENTIONS: Observational recordings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Of the 89 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 7 patients underwent 3T MRI, with a total of 39 scans done. Three patients had 1 scan each, one patient had 4 scans, one patient had 5 scans, one patient had 6 scans, and one patient had 21 scans. The mean time between ABI placement and first 3 T scan was 118 ±â€Š73 months. The most common indication for imaging was surveillance of NF2 lesions. The most frequent scans were MRI brain (25.6%), followed by MRI of cervical (15%), thoracic (15%) and lumbar (15%) spine, and MRI IAC (8%). There were no reported complications for any of the scans. No scans were interrupted due to patient discomfort. There were no device malfunctions. CONCLUSIONS: 3 T MRIs are safe in patients with ABIs as long as the magnet is removed. It is recommended that the magnet be removed at the time of implantation in all NF2 patients, who require frequent surveillance.

Evaluation of phoneme recognition skills in pediatric auditory brainstem implant users.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between phoneme recognition skills and language development skills in pediatric auditory brainstem implant (ABI) users. It further intends to identify the delays and problems that may occur in the phoneme recognition skills of children with ABI and shed light on rehabilitation programs. METHODS: Our study included 20 children using ABI and another 20 using cochlear implants (CI). They were aged between 6 and 8 years 11 months. The participants exhibited homogenous demographic and audiological characteristics. The Turkish version of the Test of Language Development-Primary: Fourth Edition (TOLDP:4) was used to evaluate the language development skills, and the Turkish version of the Phoneme Recognition Test (PRT) was applied to assess the phoneme recognition skills. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in the PRT values as well as in the language development skills between the children with ABI and those with CI. It was observed that the values of the children with CI were significantly higher than those of children with ABI. CONCLUSION: Although children with ABI were not able to match the skills of their peers with CI, their language development and communication skills improved. It is believed that this study will contribute to the literature by demonstrating that the use of ABI improves phoneme recognition skills in children who are not eligible for CI or who do not adequately benefit from CI.